Peer review is the central method through which mathematical quality is judged for dissemination and funding. Thus, it is of central interest to the discipline of mathematics that we are working to ensure that the best mathematics is supported. However, studies of peer review suggest that current practices do not always accomplish this (the problem of “epistemic injustice”). Additionally, there is considerable evidence of bias in reviews based on demographics of authors.
Bringing together philosophers and social scientists studying peer review practices in mathematics with mathematicians, representatives from funding agencies, the REF Mathematics panel and mathematical journal editors, this workshop allowed the community to discuss best practices for peer review in mathematics. The workshop provided a critical opportunity for the mathematics community to come together with peer review experts with the objective of developing strategies for peer review in contexts such as future REF panels, grants and editorial structures.
The workshop focused on three key areas of peer review:
- Publications
- REF
- Funding
Each session began with talks from experts in each area and there was ample opportunity each day for small group discussions on the topics presented.
